My second blog

I have started a new blog at http://donnajanenancyemily.blogspot.com/, called" Donna Parker, Jane Austen Nancy Drew Emily Bronte." As I write there, that blog hopes to be "the place where great women literary writers and their creations meet with girls' series books and their authors on level ground."

I thought long and hard before starting a second blog. I considered having a section of this blog devoted to discussing literature or simply moving back and forth between the two topics on this blog as the spirit moved me, but in the end decided that faith/Quakerism and girls'/women's literature were too dissimilar to mash together into one blog. Not that one doesn't inform the other, but I saw different audiences and different emphases.

I struggled with having two blogs because part of the reason I came to Quakerism was to be intergrated--to live as one person with all the strands of my life pulled together. Somehow, that seemed to me to translate into one blog. Apparently not.

I'm in an odd position right now--I plan to attend Earlham School of Religion next year, to earn an Mdiv with a emphasis on writing ministry, while I find myself more and more drawn back to Jane Austen and the Brontes. How this will all merge, I don't know. Right now, I feel somewhat bifurcated. It's also interesting to be in a position in midlife when the career I'd come to belatedly --journalism--is collapsing, and the future has the quality of discovering a new world.

I imagine people to have lives all revolving around the sun of one interest. Then I think of figures like Dorothy Sayers and JRR Tolkien, who juggled a faith life and a literary life.

I know there are some Quakers, especially Conservative, who would question any interest in the arts. However, I was reading Nancy Drew and Jane Austen long before Quakerism became a part of my life. I was formed in the kiln of reading and the best thing I can do now is to try to understand how that influenced me and others. We can't escape that we live in a media- and image-saturated world. The only alternative is to try to become Amish (or join some similar group) and I know that I, for one, would still carry around with me a lifetime of media sounds and images, from the Addams Family theme to reproductions of Da Vinci's The Last Supper. In the end, I remember too that the Bible is a work of poetry, prose visions and music (if we see the Psalms, for example, as songs) and that we experience God's creative power, as people often point out, through the arts.

My question, however, is this: Do you balance or juggle diifferent interests or vocations that seem to mesh imperfectly, and how does that work for you and your faith life?

Frank Lloyd Wright

Last Sunday, I went with Roger and a student at Olney who is writing his senior thesis (called the Grady essay) on Frank Lloyd Wright to Oberlin to tour a Wright Usonian house there called the Charles E. Weltzheimer house.

Usonians were houses Wright designed, starting in the 1930s, to be affordable for the average American (Usonian is supposed to evoke "USA.") About 100 of these houses were built around the country and a few are open to the public. Usonians could well appeal to a Quaker sensibility because they are built with simple, clean lines out of ordinary, low-cost (at the time) materials, were meant to be homes people could build themselves and were designed with some awareness of what we would today call "green" building. (I wouldn't push that too far, but Wright did orient the houses to take advantage of passive solar). The typical Usonian is L-shaped and built on one level with a living room/dining room "core" centered on a large fireplace and then a "tail" of bedrooms and bathrooms.

This Usonian was large for the time (it was designed in 1947, built in 1948 and the family of five (soon to be six) moved in in 1949). It had four bedrooms, rare in that era, and two full baths. Also unusual for a Wright house, where kitchens are usually treated as small, utilitarian workspaces, similiar to laundry rooms, the kitchen is incorporated into to the living room plan.

Although the house is named for a man, it's existence is primarily women driven. Weltzheimer's wife wanted a Usonian and wrote a letter to Wright asking him to design one for her family. In the mid-1960s, the house, which had been sold to a developer, was "saved" by a female art history professor at Oberlin, who couldn't bear what the developer was doing to the house (Installing white formica countertops in the kitchen, etc.) and bought it from him. She willed it to Oberlin before she died in the early 1990s.

Unlike other Wright houses we have seen, this one is treated not as a shrine but as a working home. Oberlin groups come in and use the house for conferences and other meetings. You see electric blankets in the linen closets and a modern coffee maker on the kitchen counter. The entire house is accessible to visitors and you are allowed to sit on the furnishings, some of which are the original Wright-designed pieces. So you come away with at least a fleeting sense of what it was like to live in the house. At one point, our Olney student sat down at the Steinway baby grand piano and began playing the Truman Show theme (I call it the official Olney theme as it is always wafting down the corridor of our Main building!). Nobody minded at all.

It was an enjoyable trip and Oberlin was a beautiful campus. Of course, the house stirred my already overactive imagination, reminding me of descriptions of similar "modern" houses in my old Donna Parker and other childhood readings, where walls of windows in bedrooms opening to patios were the height of "glam" (and often viewed with suspicion by narrators who who seemed to prefer the cosy clapboards the heroines always seemed to live in). Well, today, the glam house looks like a dated period piece, but I think we still often find "modern" architecture suspect. Do you think this is true? If so, is there a good reason for this?

Also, I was quite taken with the story of the forward looking "woman" art history professor who saved the house and fancied her having gone to college with my Majorie Dean series cohorts in the 1920s. (Anybody else read this series?) If she was anything like Majorie and her friends, this professor would have been a New Woman type, athletic (daringly playing basketball), not afraid to become educated, and above all dedicated to higher purposes, such as truth, beauty and helping the less fortunate. In a word, the type of woman who would become a college professor and dedicate herself to saving a house.

Above are an exterior and interior photo of the Weltzheimer house. You can see the L-shape of the house in the exterior photo and the piano in the interior photo.